Run Run Away

Question:

Having been a stalward NIKE Triac/Max Light fan for a dozen years I’m about to make the switch – for a number of reasons – I don’t believe their durability is what it has been in the past.  By virtue of my size, ability, mileage, etc I need a stable shoe and have narrowed it down to the Asics 2050 and Saucony Swerve.  Any experiences, good or bad with these?  I’ve read the Running Room reports. Tkx

Response:

Buy both! Use the 2050 for longer training runs and the Swerve for faster training or longer races. They will last a lot longer alternating them also. The Swerve, although stable is low profile and would not have the same stability as the 2050 if you are a heavier runner. Chris – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Having been a stalward NIKE Triac/Max Light fan for a dozen years I’m about to make the switch – for a number of reasons – I don’t believe their durability is what it has been in the past.  By virtue of my size, ability, mileage, etc I need a stable shoe and have narrowed it down to the Asics 2050 and Saucony Swerve.  Any experiences, good or bad with these?  I’ve read the Running Room reports. Tkx

Response:

 I wore the 2050s during track last year, we ran on pavement on many of our distance runs.  total mileage of 45? miles a week, they worked out great.  i never even had any small pains in my feet or joints.  and i have bad knees too… –Ashwin

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Having been a stalward NIKE Triac/Max Light fan for a dozen years I’m about to make the switch – for a number of reasons – I don’t believe their durability is what it has been in the past.  By virtue of my size, ability, mileage, etc I need a stable shoe and have narrowed it down to the Asics 2050 and Saucony Swerve.  Any experiences, good or bad with these?  I’ve read the Running Room reports. Tkx

Response:

I’m heavy (185 lbs) and I absolutely LOVE the 2050s , but they broke down pretty fast for me (< 300 miles).  I still use them but try to stay on grass rather than on pavement when I’m wearing these.  My 2 cents – if you’re average/light for your weight/height ratio, go for 2050s, they’re great! However, if you’re heavy like me, the 2050s are great, but they’ll break down fast, if you run on pavement – also try out the Asics Kayanos or NB 1220s! Cool running, and all the best!

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Having been a stalward NIKE Triac/Max Light fan for a dozen years I’m about to make the switch – for a number of reasons – I don’t believe their durability is what it has been in the past.  By virtue of my size, ability, mileage, etc I need a stable shoe and have narrowed it down to the Asics 2050 and Saucony Swerve.  Any experiences, good or bad with these?  I’ve read the Running Room reports. Tkx

Response:

I agree with you about the 2050s. Good shoes, but they don’t last long at all. Now I use the Nike Air Span Triax and I love them. They’re cheaper and last longer too. Oliver.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’m heavy (185 lbs) and I absolutely LOVE the 2050s , but they broke down pretty fast for me (< 300 miles).  I still use them but try to stay on grass rather than on pavement when I’m wearing these.  My 2 cents – if you’re average/light for your weight/height ratio, go for 2050s, they’re great! However, if you’re heavy like me, the 2050s are great, but they’ll break down fast, if you run on pavement – also try out the Asics Kayanos or NB 1220s! Cool running, and all the best! Having been a stalward NIKE Triac/Max Light fan for a dozen years I’m about to make the switch – for a number of reasons – I don’t believe their durability is what it has been in the past.  By virtue of my size, ability, mileage, etc I need a stable shoe and have narrowed it down to the Asics 2050 and Saucony Swerve.  Any experiences, good or bad with these?  I’ve read the Running Room reports. Tkx

Response:

They will last a lot longer alternating them also.

Speaking of lasting longer, how many miles can I expect a pair of shoes to hold up before I have to purchase a new pair? I’m currently alternating New Balance 586s with NB 990s.  I’m a big guy–6′4, 245 lbs which surely is a factor in how long my shoes will hold up. Am currently training for the Honolulu Marathon. –dt

Response:

By virtue of my size, ability, mileage, etc I need a stable shoe and have narrowed it down to the Asics 2050 and Saucony Swerve.  Any experiences, good or bad with these?  I’ve read the Running Room reports.

These are two *very* different shoes (I’ve worn both). The 2050’s, while advertised as a cushioned stability shoe, in effect work out to be a motion control shoe for many people. There is quite a bit of posting and the midfoot support is substantial. The Swerves are nowhere near as stable. The last is what Saucony refers to (I believe) as a "performance last", which means that it is rather curved. The Asics has a much straighter last. Expect the forefoot cushioning in the Asics to break down quickly. Sauconys tend to hold that cushioning better. My 2 cents… Wes

Response: